Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJyothibabu, R.
dc.contributor.authorMohan, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorJagadeesan, L.
dc.contributor.authorAnjusha, A.
dc.contributor.authorMuraleedharan, K.R.
dc.contributor.authorLallu, K.R.
dc.contributor.authorKiran, K.
dc.contributor.authorUllas, N.
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-04T04:31:55Z
dc.date.available2013-02-04T04:31:55Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Marine Systems, vol.111-112; 2013; 29-44
dc.identifier.otherno
dc.identifier.urihttp://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/4237
dc.description.abstractThe Gulf of Mannar (GoM) and the Palk Bay (PB) are two least studied marine environments located between India and Sri Lanka. The environmental and smaller plankton (0.2–20 mu m) data from 30 locations in the GoM and PB during the northeast monsoon (November-February) are presented in this paper. Coastal currents during the study period was from the east to west and as a result, the PB had Bay of Bengal (BoB) waters, which was low saline (av. 28.98 plus or minus 1.34) as compared to the GoM (av. 31.96 plus or minus 0.58). The BoB waters caused significantly higher turbidity in the PB (av. 7.84 plus or minus 13.59 NTU) as compared to the GoM (av. 1.76 plus or minus 1.38 NTU). Multivariate analyses of hydrographical parameters demarcated two separate clusters in the study area clearly segregating the GoM and PB. This was mainly due to the physical barriers (Rameswaram Island, Ramsethu and Mannar Island) that inhibit the mixing of waters between the GoM and PB. The fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry data showed a high abundance of picoeukaryotes, heterotrophic bacteria and autotrophic nanoplankton in the GoM whereas, Synechococcus and heterotrophic nanoplankton were higher in the PB. The picoplankton and nanoplankton carbon biomass was higher in the GoM (av. 62.2 mgC m sup(-3)) as compared to the PB (av. 47.6 mgC sup(-3)). The carbon biomass in the GoM and PB was mainly contributed by nanoplankton (more than 70 percent) signifying their trophic preference in the study area. The carbon contribution of different plankton components in the GoM was autotrophic nanoplankton > heterotrophic bacteria > heterotrophic nanoplankton > Synechococcus > picoeukaryotes. On the other hand, heterotrophic nanoplankton was the second most dominant component in the PB followed by heterotrophic bacteria, Synechococcus and picoeukaryotes. The redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that picoeukaryotes, heterotrophic bacteria and autotrophic nanoplankton are positively correlated with salinity and nitrate, whereas Synechococcus and heterotrophic nanoplankton are positively correlated with turbidity, phosphate and dissolved oxygen. The data presented in this paper forms the first information on the relative trophic preference of various fractions of smaller plankton in Indian coastal waters.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.requiresJ_Mar_Syst_111-112_29.jpg
dc.rightsAn edited version of this paper was published by Elsevier. Copyright [2012] Elsevier
dc.subjectnannoplankton
dc.subjectplankton
dc.subjectecology
dc.subjecttrophic relationships
dc.titleEcology and trophic preference of picoplankton and nanoplankton in the Gulf of Mannar and the Palk Bay, southeast coast of India
dc.typeJournal Article


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record